6,562
edits
Forum:Discontinuity revisited: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Formatting
| Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
::Yeah, I think that's good too. I just think that each point should be individually identifiable. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 12:20, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ::Yeah, I think that's good too. I just think that each point should be individually identifiable. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 12:20, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes, that likely be useful as long as we can make sure everyone follows this system. Rather than going with how talk pages are formatted and indented correctly. (The report writer in me though does say 'counter argument to point 2 should be labelled 2.1, but then that's me obsessing over tiny details). | :::Yes, that likely be useful as long as we can make sure everyone follows this system. Rather than going with how talk pages are formatted and indented correctly. (The report writer in me though does say 'counter argument to point 2 should be labelled 2.1, but then that's me obsessing over tiny details). | ||
:::The only issue I have is rolling it out to the 500+ articles some of which have variable formatting which may hamper any automatic change over to this format. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:59, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | :::The only issue I have is rolling it out to the 500+ articles some of which have variable formatting which may hamper any automatic change over to this format. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:59, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor/proposed Discontinuity formatting|Here]] is the altered page, and you can compare it with the [[[[Forum:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Cold Blood|present page.]] What do you think?--[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:25, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | |||
