Talk:TV21 — Almost Perfect! (short story): Difference between revisions

Talk:TV21 — Almost Perfect! (short story) (edit)

220 bytes added , 6 September

Trusted

49,419

edits

Revision as of 19:56, 6 September 2024 (edit) Aquanafrahudy (talk \| contribs) (→‎Invalidity) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:10, 6 September 2024 (edit) (undo) Epsilon (talk \| contribs) (→‎Invalidity) Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:: Perhaps it could instead merit the "(fan work)" dab term and treatment entailed therein, rather than invalid coverage? It would certainly seem more liable for that than for actual coverage as a story, it very much failing rule 2, seeing as TV21 never had the Doctor Who license in the first place and this is at any rate after they've lost the Dalek license. {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 19:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)		:: Perhaps it could instead merit the "(fan work)" dab term and treatment entailed therein, rather than invalid coverage? It would certainly seem more liable for that than for actual coverage as a story, it very much failing rule 2, seeing as TV21 never had the Doctor Who license in the first place and this is at any rate after they've lost the Dalek license. {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 19:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

			::: Calling an officially printed story that came from a series with historic connections to licensed media a "(fan work)" doesn't sit right with me. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 20:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)