Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,180
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::(Oh, and Maestro's "he can't have been there!" is not so surprising if one bears in mind that Maestro hasn't actually watched ''The Church on Ruby Road''. By which I mean, they don't know that the Doctor's TARDIS ''was'' there on Ruby Road on the night of Ruby's birth.) --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | :::(Oh, and Maestro's "he can't have been there!" is not so surprising if one bears in mind that Maestro hasn't actually watched ''The Church on Ruby Road''. By which I mean, they don't know that the Doctor's TARDIS ''was'' there on Ruby Road on the night of Ruby's birth.) --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::::I've also just seen that the "Nature" section has been restructured. While I like highlighting the difference between the pre- and post-RTD2 depictions of the Pantheon (indeed, in precisely the same spirit as that which I discuss re: Sutekh), I do feel it suffers from not having a section clearly giving an easily-legible list of all individuals who have been asserted to be members of the Pantheon in one source or another. Any thoughts on how to include such a section without repeating info from other sections too egregiously?… Perhaps we don't need the Harriet-list to be presented in full in the RTD2 one? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC) |