6,562
edits
Forum:Rumours: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
(reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Forum archives header|Panopticon archives}}  | ||
Quite a few of the pages I look at or edit have so called rumours on them which in my view are just personal opinions. I firmly beleive that all rumours should always have sources cited or discussed first else be removed. What do other contributors think? | Quite a few of the pages I look at or edit have so called rumours on them which in my view are just personal opinions. I firmly beleive that all rumours should always have sources cited or discussed first else be removed. What do other contributors think? | ||
An example where rumours are getting ridiculous are on the [[The Next Doctor]] page [[User:Smokin Fish|Smokin Fish]] 16:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | An example where rumours are getting ridiculous are on the [[The Next Doctor]] page [[User:Smokin Fish|Smokin Fish]] 16:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Just to repost my comment from [[Talk:The Next Doctor]]<br> | :Just to repost my comment from [[Talk:The Next Doctor]]<br /> | ||
:Well I'm not entirely happy with such a section myself. I did start it just to have some place for the amount of unsourced information going into the articles, but I would be quite happy if it wasn't there at all. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 19:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | :Well I'm not entirely happy with such a section myself. I did start it just to have some place for the amount of unsourced information going into the articles, but I would be quite happy if it wasn't there at all. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 19:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
