Forum:The Man with the Rosette: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
:::::[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 15:46, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
:::::[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 15:46, October 27, 2010 (UTC)


I give several marks for dedication to type that out. (I have by the way read ''Henrietta Street'', all the EDAs in fact more than twice for all except ''The Domino Effect'' to ''The Gallfifrey Chronicles'' which I've read once)  
I give several marks for dedication to type that out. (I have by the way read ''Henrietta Street'', all the EDAs in fact more than twice for all except ''The Domino Effect'' to ''The Gallfifrey Chronicles'' which I've read once)


...But...the article I think should stay named as it is, but it can say something along the lines of 'dialogue between the Doctor and the Man suggests they have a history; the Man stating...' and add a quote from somewhere here.  
...But...the article I think should stay named as it is, but it can say something along the lines of 'dialogue between the Doctor and the Man suggests they have a history; the Man stating...' and add a quote from somewhere here.


I '''don't think''' the article should be renamed "The Master (The Adventuress of Henrietta Street)". But if there's any further information out there that ties the Master to the Man or vice versa then that can be stated.  
I '''don't think''' the article should be renamed "The Master (The Adventuress of Henrietta Street)". But if there's any further information out there that ties the Master to the Man or vice versa then that can be stated.


But looking at the dialogue and pretending not to know about the Master, what's learned from this exchange is the Man is of the same creed as the Doctor - a Time Lord and that they operated on opposing sides. Without supporting evidence it could be anyone. But it is ''suggestive'' of being the Doctor.  
But looking at the dialogue and pretending not to know about the Master, what's learned from this exchange is the Man is of the same creed as the Doctor - a Time Lord and that they operated on opposing sides. Without supporting evidence it could be anyone. But it is ''suggestive'' of being the Doctor.


We also need to acknowledge that ''Henrietta Street'' isn't written in the conventional style, but in faux-historical text, so there may be liberties taken with what's described. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:18, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
We also need to acknowledge that ''Henrietta Street'' isn't written in the conventional style, but in faux-historical text, so there may be liberties taken with what's described. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:18, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
: Ill admit that i didnt write that out but copied it from an ebook, kudos on the reading, i will get round to reading them all ''once'' eventually, they are super books. I agree the article name should stay as it is, and i will look for internet sources and things from the novels that can pin him down to being the Master. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 16:26, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
35,119

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.