443
edits
Forum:Premature page policies - again: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Premature page policies - again (edit)
Revision as of 18:39, 15 December 2010
, 15 December 2010no edit summary
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
I agree with Skittles, the locking prevents the article from being vandalised until heat has died away after broadcast. It can be a pain to constantly roll back edits, which is something i havent seen either Joshoedit or Ghastly do before. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 16:24, November 21, 2010 (UTC) | I agree with Skittles, the locking prevents the article from being vandalised until heat has died away after broadcast. It can be a pain to constantly roll back edits, which is something i havent seen either Joshoedit or Ghastly do before. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 16:24, November 21, 2010 (UTC) | ||
All i'm saying is that, i agree that the pages should be protected, But to put more info on the pages, all this "keep it minimum, it'll be quicker to flood the page with info" Isn't true most of the SJA episodes under the policy are still stubs MONTHS later. Also when the christmas carol page was created the rumours section and some area of story notes could be cleaned up to make the page look less crowded by no, It would be better to have all the relevant Info on the relevant pages, so you don't have to run back and forth on the series page to get info. [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 18:39, December 15, 2010 (UTC) Ps. The Pandorica Opens thing It was at the episodes beginning ONLY and mentioned briefly. I forgot what it was called 1/2 way through, It probably came out during watching a recorded version | |||
==How early should pages be created/fully protected?== | ==How early should pages be created/fully protected?== | ||
