Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


::The site itself identifies as "completely unofficial".  Case closed. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''20:35:11 Mon&nbsp;'''28 Mar 2011&nbsp;</span>
::The site itself identifies as "completely unofficial".  Case closed. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''20:35:11 Mon&nbsp;'''28 Mar 2011&nbsp;</span>
I have to take the blame for this. I was the person that started using D.W.S as a active source, so I apologise, BUT I do have a point to make. Soem of the facts are true, like episode 3's name is ''The Doctor's Wife'' and they have extensive CV sources that notify them when a casting decision is made. Mabye, instead of totally blacklisting it, we should only use casting sources? I know it would be hard and it's breaking the manual of style, but some of the facts are true. --[[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 15:08, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
887

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.