Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource: Difference between revisions

Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource (edit)

169 bytes added , 29 March 2011

no edit summary

emailconfirmed, Administrators

43,565

edits

Revision as of 15:08, 29 March 2011 (edit) GhastlyKhaos (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:53, 29 March 2011 (edit) (undo) Skittles the hog (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 25:		Line 25:

	I have to take the blame for this. I was the person that started using D.W.S as a active source, so I apologise, BUT I do have a point to make. Soem of the facts are true, like episode 3's name is ''The Doctor's Wife'' and they have extensive CV sources that notify them when a casting decision is made. Mabye, instead of totally blacklisting it, we should only use casting sources? I know it would be hard and it's breaking the manual of style, but some of the facts are true. --[[User:Ghastly9090\|Ghastly9090]] 15:08, March 29, 2011 (UTC)		I have to take the blame for this. I was the person that started using D.W.S as a active source, so I apologise, BUT I do have a point to make. Soem of the facts are true, like episode 3's name is ''The Doctor's Wife'' and they have extensive CV sources that notify them when a casting decision is made. Mabye, instead of totally blacklisting it, we should only use casting sources? I know it would be hard and it's breaking the manual of style, but some of the facts are true. --[[User:Ghastly9090\|Ghastly9090]] 15:08, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

			You should have stopped with the apology.----[[User:Skittles the hog\|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog\|Talk]]</small> 15:53, March 29, 2011 (UTC)