|
|
| Line 109: |
Line 109: |
|
| |
|
| When I was talking about changing it to near-timelord, I was mainly thinking about the Doctor's comments in ''The Beast Below'' when he told Amy that she looked Time Lord, because they came first. Either way, the way the term is used now, the little girl is definetly a human or a near-human.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 20:20, May 4, 2011 (UTC) | | When I was talking about changing it to near-timelord, I was mainly thinking about the Doctor's comments in ''The Beast Below'' when he told Amy that she looked Time Lord, because they came first. Either way, the way the term is used now, the little girl is definetly a human or a near-human.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 20:20, May 4, 2011 (UTC) |
|
| |
| == Pond's daughter ==
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| This is most likely Amy Ponds unborn child. The silence tell Amy she will help bring the silence. The child is a mix of human/time lord dna due to Amy time on the TARDIS.
| |
|
| |
| I agree with this but I think the little girl is the Doctor's daughter as well as Amy's.
| |
|
| |
| [[Special:Contributions/82.26.157.86|82.26.157.86]] 15:16, May 16, 2011 (UTC)CPC1
| |
|
| |
| :Please take this discussion to [[Forum:The Howling|the Howling]]. Thank you. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 15:26, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Theories about the Moniter changing from Positive to Negative ==
| |
|
| |
| As I'm sure you remember at the end of the episode the Doctor had a moniter with an X-ray switching between Positive and Negative, which is probably safe to say is examining to see if Amy is pregnant. I have two theories about this. First; it has been shown that the TARDIS can be used as a paradox machine which would require that it could detect paradoxes, so maybe something they've done might change and make it so Amy doesn't become pregnant and thus the TARDIS is in the middle of detecting the switch in timelines, but it might go back and forth because it's something they might have done yet or something that may or may not change Amy being pregnant. My second theory is that it's saying she is pregnant but the negative is saying that it's not actually hers, like she's a surrogate mother, most likely the Doctor's DNA is involved since the girl was able to do something that at least appeared very much like Regeneration; we never saw the result and knowing Moffat it might end up being something different or just not working at all and only being the beginning of a Regeneration. [[User:GrimmShadows|GrimmShadows]] 12:15, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :Please take this to [[Howling:The Howling|the Howling]]. Thank you. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 12:32, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
