3,912
edits
Talk:Lake Silencio: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→River?
No edit summary |
Bold Clone (talk | contribs) (→River?) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
What proof does ''anyone'' have that River Song was not the astronaut? The astronaut killed the Doctor at the Lake--FACT. We know that River killed the Doctor--FACT. Therefore, River is the astronaut that killed the Doctor--FACT. What "proof" is there otherwise? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 15:24, August 31, 2011 (UTC) | What proof does ''anyone'' have that River Song was not the astronaut? The astronaut killed the Doctor at the Lake--FACT. We know that River killed the Doctor--FACT. Therefore, River is the astronaut that killed the Doctor--FACT. What "proof" is there otherwise? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 15:24, August 31, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Lack of negative oproof is not the same as positive proof.[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 15:36, August 31, 2011 (UTC) | Lack of negative oproof is not the same as positive proof.[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 15:36, August 31, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, I would rather wait for more on screen evidence until you make a conclusion.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 15:38, August 31, 2011 (UTC) | :Yeah, I would rather wait for more on screen evidence until you make a conclusion.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 15:38, August 31, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:@Boblipton:We have ''positive'' proof. We also have a ''lack'' of negative proof. We ''know'' that the Doctor dies--we saw that. We ''also'' know that River was the one to kill him (''Let's Kill Hitler''). Can you prove that wrong? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 00:09, September 1, 2011 (UTC) | |||
