Talk:Lake Silencio: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
11 bytes removed ,  2 September 2011
Line 51: Line 51:
:::Was it said in the episode "River Song killed the Doctor by Lake Silencio?" No it didn't. It could be she killed the Doctor in what he believes, kills him for what he is (what she told him in AGMGTW). It could also be a red-herring. We don't know who's in the suit, to to say it's River Song is speculation and against the MOS. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 15:08, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
:::Was it said in the episode "River Song killed the Doctor by Lake Silencio?" No it didn't. It could be she killed the Doctor in what he believes, kills him for what he is (what she told him in AGMGTW). It could also be a red-herring. We don't know who's in the suit, to to say it's River Song is speculation and against the MOS. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 15:08, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
:::
:::
:::Boldclone, you keep repeating that we know this. Please look up the words "know" and "believe" in the dictionary. We know '''facts'''. Should later episodes show that River did not murder the Doctor, would it then cease to be a fact? The statement "River killed the Doctor" is not a fact. It is a reasonable inference that you believe. I do not dispute the reasonableness of the inference, but I do dispute the evidence of its factuality.
:::Boldclone, you keep repeating that we know this. Please look up the words "know" and "believe" in the dictionary. We know '''facts'''. Should later episodes show that River did not murder the Doctor, would it then cease to be a fact? The statement "River killed the Doctor" is not a a statement of fact. It is a reasonable inference that you believe. I do not dispute the reasonableness of the inference, but I do dispute its factuality.
:::
:::
:::Also, please do not argue your case by repeatedly telling me what "we know." I don't know this, so this is a false statement, and the repetition serves no purpose but to annoy me and t and make me write these posts which, undoubtedly, annoy you. I'm not here to annoy you and don't like doing it. I fully expect that by the end of the season we will see what happens at Lake Silencio from a different viewpoint. Let us be patient. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 15:18, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
:::Also, please do not argue your case by repeatedly telling me what "we know." I don't know this, so this is a false statement, and the repetition serves no purpose but to annoy me and and make me write these posts which, undoubtedly, annoy you. I'm not here to annoy you and don't like doing it. I fully expect that by the end of the season we will see what happens at Lake Silencio from a different viewpoint. Let us be patient. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 15:18, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
49,076

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.