Talk:Lake Silencio: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
1,715 bytes added ,  2 September 2011
Line 69: Line 69:
::
::
::Indeed, it should remain "unknown" until it is definitely shown on screen (probably at the end of the series). Much as I am offended by Bold's misappropraition of 'Science' here, I'll ignore it and simply suggest that this is a'' fictional universe;'' it's not governed by science or logic but by the ideas of a writer who simply wants a good story - that makes it ''an art -'' therefore there aren't really any facts, only opinions and interpretations of what is shown. [[User:Baziel|Baziel]] 18:13, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
::Indeed, it should remain "unknown" until it is definitely shown on screen (probably at the end of the series). Much as I am offended by Bold's misappropraition of 'Science' here, I'll ignore it and simply suggest that this is a'' fictional universe;'' it's not governed by science or logic but by the ideas of a writer who simply wants a good story - that makes it ''an art -'' therefore there aren't really any facts, only opinions and interpretations of what is shown. [[User:Baziel|Baziel]] 18:13, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
:@TGD: We already ''have'' proof--it's like on the River Song page: "The Doctor would later discover from the Teselecta data records that the man she killed was ''himself'', and that he died on [[22nd April]] 2011 at 5:02pm in [[Utah]], at [[Lake Silencio]]. ([[DW]]: ''[[Let's Kill Hitler]]'')" Those are two facts--River killed the Doctor (Or at least everyone thinks it was River, and for that matter they also think it was the Doctor who died, instead of a Ganger, and Lake Silencio, instead of a digital reality--really, if you're going to deny the Teselecta's claim on the grounds that they could be wrong, you might as well discount everything else in DW on the grounds that they could be wrong...especially the regeneration limit.), and that the Doctor died at the lake. Really, it's not hard to put two and two together--DW's 5-year-old fans can figure out what that's implying. Based off of the best current in-universe infromation that we have at the moment, River was the one in the suit. Yes, the info may change, but that's the beauty of a wiki--if things change, we can admit we were wrong and adjust the page to accomedate new info; that's what we should ahve done with the Little Girl/River issue, acknowledge the explicit implication, and accept it on the grounds that it was the best factual in-universe explanation. The Doctor is murdered by River, and we saw the Doctor get murdered. Therefore, River was the one in the suit. It's logical--not one of you can deny that. So why are you all so unwilling to bend to the facts? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:15, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
3,912

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.