User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-26975268-20130221032317
Okay. Number one:
For "vital stats," things like "was born" and "died" would get extremely redundant. Unless you want to start adding information like where they died/were born, we'd have to do something like this:
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 |
On 1 May, many people were born and many died. The following is a list of every birth and death of individuals who have appeared in, or have connections with, the Doctor Who universe and its related media:
Births[[edit] | [edit source]]
- 1918 - Actor James Copeland
- 1937 - Actress Una Stubbs
- 1946 - Actress Joanna Lumley
Deaths[[edit] | [edit source]]
- 1985 - Actor George Pravda
- 2002 - Producer John Nathan-Turner
- 2008 - Actor Bernard Archard
Yes, the first sentence could do with a rewording, and, yes, you might say that there isn't enough info to constitute a whole section. (1 May doesn't have anywhere close to as many births and deaths as certain other days) But consider the alternative:
- 1918 - Actor James Copeland was born.
- 1937 - Actress Una Stubbs was born.
- 1946 - Actress Joanna Lumley was born.
- 1985 - Actor George Pravda died.
- 2002 - Producer John Nathan-Turner died.
- 2008 - Actor Bernard Archard died.
Redundant, no?