Talk:Eighth Doctor: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving to Talk:Eighth_Doctor/Archive 2.)
 
(64 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArchCat}}
{{ArchCat}}
=== Canon debate ===
When I encountered it, article had this dubiously helpful information:
:Due to the nature of the 1996 movie, and certain continuity-bending issues raised by it, the place of the eighth incarnation within canon remained a matter of sometimes heated fan debate for more than a decade, until the revival of ''Doctor Who'' in 2005 directly addressed the issue.


:In the 2007 episode [[TV]]: ''[[Human Nature (TV story)|Human Nature]]'', a drawing of the eighth incarnation, as played by McGann, was briefly glimpsed on one of the pages of [[John Smith (Tenth Doctor)|John Smith]]'s "[[A Journal of Impossible Things (Human Nature)|A Journal of Impossible Things]]", alongside drawings of other established incarnations. Later, the 2008 Christmas special, [[TV]]: ''[[The Next Doctor]]'', put the issue to rest fully by including brief footage of Paul McGann from the TV movie in a recap of the Doctor's first nine incarnations. A similar on-screen appearance, again using footage from the movie, occurred in the 2010 episode [[TV]]: ''[[The Eleventh Hour]]'' in another "roll call" of past Doctors. An image of the eighth incarnation appeared yet again during a sequence in the later Series 5 episode, [[TV]]: ''[[The Lodger (TV story)|The Lodger]]'', which also included a line of dialogue explicitly identifying the incarnation played by [[Matt Smith]] as the eleventh, and therefore accounting for the incarnation portrayed by McGann.
== Doctor Who and the Time War and its relation to canon ==
This seems to have survived from the Dark Times on this wiki, but it's not particularly relevant now.  It's been a long damn time since anyone in fandom seriously posited the notion of Eight being "unofficial" in any sense.  We've known since ''Rose'' that Eccleston was the Ninth Doctor. RTD made that very clear when he stepped in and declared ''Shalka'' invalid. The BBC website has ''always'' referred to Eccleston as Nine ''from day one''.  Yes, there was long the narrative possibility that he wasn't, but, realistically, it's always been production intent that he be viewed as Nine.  
''Doctor Who and the Time War'' definitely belongs on here, but shouldn't it be placed in the alternate timelines section? It's stated as events from a parallel universe by Davies and in the introduction. [[User:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived]] [[User talk:Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:48, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
: A problem with classing it as an alternate timeline is the fact that the story is later alluded to in ''[[Revenge of the Nestene (short story)|Revenge of the Nestene]]''. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:56, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
:: For one thing, an [[alternate timeline]] and a [[parallel universe]] are two different concepts in the ''Doctor Who'' universe. Something stated to be a parallel universe would necessitate the creation of [[Eighth Doctor (Time War World)]] or whatever, like e.g. [[Peter Tyler (Pete's World)]].


Point is, this passage seems to unnecessarily drag us into a "canon debate", and there's really no point to it. What the article could use, instead, is a well-annotated explanation of how the ''specific'' issues of "half-human-ness" and kissing were ''controversial''. But "canon" shouldn't be the main focus of it.  It's hard to say fans ever had an argument for him being non-canonical when they saw McCoy regenerate into him. The issue is just that (some) fans '''didn't like''' these two aspects of his character. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 13:39: Mon 12 Nov 2012</span>
::Furthermore, Davies doesn't say it's a parallel universe, he says the story constitutes a glimpse of "parallel events". This could mean many things, and must be confronted with Davies also saying in the same breath that "all stories are true", and, as [[User:WaltK]] said, with the fact that in a new story, written this year in full knowledge of ''Night of the Doctor'', he still chooses to reference facts from ''Doctor Who and the Time War''
 
::It seems far more likely to me, in light of the latter comment, that he means it in the sense that we're seeing a glimpse into a parallel history ''of the show'' where [[Steven Moffat]] did not write ''[[The Day of the Doctor (TV story)|The Day of the Doctor]]'' and thus Davies was able to release ''Doctor Who and the Time War'' in DWM for the 50th anniversary. Which is distinct from the story, ''in universe'', being a parallel universe or alternate timeline.
 
::Heck, "parallel events" can mean anything. It could just be a case of events happening "in parallel", that is to say at the same time as one another. Considering what a brain-bendingly timey-wimey Time War is depicted by Davies in this story and ''[[Revenge of the Nestene (short story)|Revenge of the Nestene]]'', what's to say that somehow, the Eighth Doctor and the War Doctor don't simultaneously regenerate into the same incarnation as timelines collapse around them? Weirder things have happened in the DWU. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:04, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
 
::: Quick admin note (more related to the title than the discussion itself). This story's relation to canon, as far as the wiki is concerned, is the same as any other's: [[Tardis:Canon policy|"we don't believe there is such a thing as a "canon" for ''Doctor Who''"]]. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 23:12, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
 
::: The stuff in "alternate timelines" mostly refers to versions of this Doctor whose existence is presented in their respective stories as an alternative in relation to a ''primary'' version of the Doctor who is ''in the same stories'' (i.e. the "[[Johann Schmidt]]" Eighth Doctor who is an alternate future for the [[Seventh Doctor]] around whom the Klein arc revolves). ''[[Doctor Who and the Time War (short story)|Doctor Who and the Time War]]'' doesn't really fit that mould, so its current placement and framing is the right way to go. Instead of speculating the how and why of it all in the article itself, I think it's best just acknowledge that it differs from most accounts of the Eighth Doctor's final days and immediate future. People can decide for themselves how it happened and fits into their own personal "canon" (if indeed it fits for them at all :P) [[User:Toqgers|Toqgers]] [[User talk:Toqgers|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:09, March 28, 2020 (UTC)
:::: This is, I agree, the best approach (and the one, it seems, dictated by policy). We take things as they are, and offer alternate accounts when they're given. "Parallel events" can indeed mean so many things.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 04:08, March 28, 2020 (UTC)
 
== Infobox image update? ==
<gallery>
Eight.jpg|Current
McGannLooksLeft.jpg|#1
Eight Dark Eyes Infobox Example.jpg|#2
</gallery>
I would like to propose a new infobox image (see right). — [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Talk">•</span>]] 13:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 
: The gremlin in me wants to propose an EU image considering television isn't this Doctor's primary medium. However I expect nobody to agree with me here. Just my thoughts on the matter. [[User:Epsilon|&#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature&#125;&#125;]] [[User talk:Epsilon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
:: Ooh, this is actually really nice. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
:::I'm against an EU image, but maybe it could be put to a vote? Might be worth getting a gallery going on here, of TV images as well as EU images, so people can then vote on preferences? — [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Talk">•</span>]] 16:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 
:::: I feel unfortunately that the EU may not provide too many good images, as prose is usually unillustrated, comics can often vary in quality, and audio covers aren't the best source. Although, considering that Big Finish promo pictures can be used as valid illustrations now, we could look for an image of Eight in his ''Dark Eyes'' costume. [[User:Epsilon|&#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature&#125;&#125;]] [[User talk:Epsilon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 
::::: Added an example. [[User:Epsilon|&#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature&#125;&#125;]] [[User talk:Epsilon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 
::::::: I don't think that would be a good idea, in [[T:NPOV]] terms. The TVM look is one which all the various ranges agree upon as something the Eighth Doctor did look like at ''one'' point, while the ''Dark Eyes'' makeover is a quirk of one particular version. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 
:::::::: I agree with Scrooge tbh. Also, Epsilon, TV isn't the Decayed Master's primary medium either but we still use an image from his TV appearance. — [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Talk">•</span>]] 22:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 
:::::::: Same goes for the War Doctor too, I guess. — [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Talk">•</span>]] 22:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 
::::::::: I didn't expect the ''Dark Eyes'' to be particularly the best idea. But when we've a characters with barely three onscreen appearances and hundreds in other mediums, it does strike me a little... unneutral to use a television image.
::::::::: Perhaps a tabbed gallery in thr infobox, so we can have images from Eight's different mediums? We don't ordinarily do this, especially given that Eight doesn't look that different between mediums, but considering Eight's era is 99% EU content, it may be a special case. [[User:Epsilon|&#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature&#125;&#125;]] [[User talk:Epsilon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:11, 1 March 2024

Archive.png
Archives: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5

Doctor Who and the Time War and its relation to canon[[edit source]]

Doctor Who and the Time War definitely belongs on here, but shouldn't it be placed in the alternate timelines section? It's stated as events from a parallel universe by Davies and in the introduction. Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived 20:48, March 27, 2020 (UTC)

A problem with classing it as an alternate timeline is the fact that the story is later alluded to in Revenge of the Nestene. WaltK 20:56, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
For one thing, an alternate timeline and a parallel universe are two different concepts in the Doctor Who universe. Something stated to be a parallel universe would necessitate the creation of Eighth Doctor (Time War World) or whatever, like e.g. Peter Tyler (Pete's World).
Furthermore, Davies doesn't say it's a parallel universe, he says the story constitutes a glimpse of "parallel events". This could mean many things, and must be confronted with Davies also saying in the same breath that "all stories are true", and, as User:WaltK said, with the fact that in a new story, written this year in full knowledge of Night of the Doctor, he still chooses to reference facts from Doctor Who and the Time War
It seems far more likely to me, in light of the latter comment, that he means it in the sense that we're seeing a glimpse into a parallel history of the show where Steven Moffat did not write The Day of the Doctor and thus Davies was able to release Doctor Who and the Time War in DWM for the 50th anniversary. Which is distinct from the story, in universe, being a parallel universe or alternate timeline.
Heck, "parallel events" can mean anything. It could just be a case of events happening "in parallel", that is to say at the same time as one another. Considering what a brain-bendingly timey-wimey Time War is depicted by Davies in this story and Revenge of the Nestene, what's to say that somehow, the Eighth Doctor and the War Doctor don't simultaneously regenerate into the same incarnation as timelines collapse around them? Weirder things have happened in the DWU. --Scrooge MacDuck 22:04, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
Quick admin note (more related to the title than the discussion itself). This story's relation to canon, as far as the wiki is concerned, is the same as any other's: "we don't believe there is such a thing as a "canon" for Doctor Who". OncomingStorm12th (talk) 23:12, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
The stuff in "alternate timelines" mostly refers to versions of this Doctor whose existence is presented in their respective stories as an alternative in relation to a primary version of the Doctor who is in the same stories (i.e. the "Johann Schmidt" Eighth Doctor who is an alternate future for the Seventh Doctor around whom the Klein arc revolves). Doctor Who and the Time War doesn't really fit that mould, so its current placement and framing is the right way to go. Instead of speculating the how and why of it all in the article itself, I think it's best just acknowledge that it differs from most accounts of the Eighth Doctor's final days and immediate future. People can decide for themselves how it happened and fits into their own personal "canon" (if indeed it fits for them at all :P) Toqgers 00:09, March 28, 2020 (UTC)
This is, I agree, the best approach (and the one, it seems, dictated by policy). We take things as they are, and offer alternate accounts when they're given. "Parallel events" can indeed mean so many things.
× SOTO (//) 04:08, March 28, 2020 (UTC)

Infobox image update?[[edit source]]

I would like to propose a new infobox image (see right). — Fractal Doctor 13:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

The gremlin in me wants to propose an EU image considering television isn't this Doctor's primary medium. However I expect nobody to agree with me here. Just my thoughts on the matter. {{SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature}} 16:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Ooh, this is actually really nice. --Scrooge MacDuck 16:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm against an EU image, but maybe it could be put to a vote? Might be worth getting a gallery going on here, of TV images as well as EU images, so people can then vote on preferences? — Fractal Doctor 16:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I feel unfortunately that the EU may not provide too many good images, as prose is usually unillustrated, comics can often vary in quality, and audio covers aren't the best source. Although, considering that Big Finish promo pictures can be used as valid illustrations now, we could look for an image of Eight in his Dark Eyes costume. {{SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature}} 21:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Added an example. {{SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature}} 21:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I don't think that would be a good idea, in T:NPOV terms. The TVM look is one which all the various ranges agree upon as something the Eighth Doctor did look like at one point, while the Dark Eyes makeover is a quirk of one particular version. --Scrooge MacDuck 21:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I agree with Scrooge tbh. Also, Epsilon, TV isn't the Decayed Master's primary medium either but we still use an image from his TV appearance. — Fractal Doctor 22:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Same goes for the War Doctor too, I guess. — Fractal Doctor 22:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I didn't expect the Dark Eyes to be particularly the best idea. But when we've a characters with barely three onscreen appearances and hundreds in other mediums, it does strike me a little... unneutral to use a television image.
Perhaps a tabbed gallery in thr infobox, so we can have images from Eight's different mediums? We don't ordinarily do this, especially given that Eight doesn't look that different between mediums, but considering Eight's era is 99% EU content, it may be a special case. {{SUBST:User:Epsilon/signature}} 22:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)