Talk:Destination: Skaro (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Simplequote|Going forward, an out-of-universe perspective should be favoured in all continuity sections if possible.|[[User:Scrooge MacDuck]]}} | {{Simplequote|Going forward, an out-of-universe perspective should be favoured in all continuity sections if possible.|[[User:Scrooge MacDuck]]}} | ||
: Continuity is firmly an out of universe concept so it makes no sense to write about it from an in-universe perspective. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 23:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | : Continuity is firmly an out of universe concept so it makes no sense to write about it from an in-universe perspective. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 23:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I still think it's a ludicrous notion, as continuity has always referenced in-universe events and been citated as such, and User:WaltK's confusion is just further proof as to why the decision should be reopened for evaluation.[[User:BananaClownMan|BananaClownMan]] [[User talk:BananaClownMan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:28, 18 November 2023
Voice of Nyder
I guess nobody was credited for providing Nyder's voice. Is there any information online that could indicate who it was? If I had to guess, my bet would be on Nicholas Briggs, but that's pure speculation on my part. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by ElectricFire 169 (talk • contribs) .
- The page claims Nicholas Briggs but provides no source? — Fractal Doctor @ 19:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Why is everything in the wrong place?
Everything currently in the continuity section is formatted as, or outright should be in the notes section, but my attempts to move it to the correct section were quickly reversed. None of this is right. WaltK ☎ 21:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Actually it is correct. As per @Scrooge MacDuck's ruling on Forum:Non-valid Continuity sections, categories, and prefixes, an out of universe perspective should be used in continuity sections.
"Going forward, an out-of-universe perspective should be favoured in all continuity sections if possible."
- Continuity is firmly an out of universe concept so it makes no sense to write about it from an in-universe perspective. 23:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- I still think it's a ludicrous notion, as continuity has always referenced in-universe events and been citated as such, and User:WaltK's confusion is just further proof as to why the decision should be reopened for evaluation.BananaClownMan ☎ 22:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
