Forum:Making pages for individual VHS/DVD/ect. releases

Index → The Panopticon → Making pages for individual VHS/DVD/ect. releases

Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Opening

This one should be pretty straightforward; I think there should be pages for each individual home video release of Doctor Who media.

The way we cover it now is in the form of lists, or relegated to the bottoms of story articles. But I think they should get pages in the same vain as those that we do for graphic novel compilations.

Simple. I… can't think of anymore reason than that. WaltK ☎

Discussion

Umm... Why? The lists, for me, appear to suffice. What new information would be presented in these articles that could not easily be found elsewhere? Aquanafrahudy 📢 18:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Easy:

• 1) To include coverage on things like bonus features and other miscellaneous info that the lists currently don't.
• 2) To declutter those story pages just a little bit.
• 3) For consistency. As I pointed out, doing this would be no different from covering the individual graphic novel releases we get for comic stories.

WaltK ☎ 18:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Okay then, I support this proposal. Aquanafrahudy 📢 18:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I do think one major failing of our website is that our story of DVD releases isn't clear enough. But in some cases would it not make more sense to have a subpage? Like, The Five Doctors (TV story)/Home video or something. Then we'd have full subsections about each release and the material included, galleries, etc. I don't see the point in having pages like The Five Doctors (1985 VHS), The Five Doctors (1990 VHS), The Five Doctors (1999 DVD), The Five Doctors (2008 DVD) etc.

One thing I do think is that special collections (like... The Collection) should have their own pages. There is no reason that The Collection Season 12 shouldn't exist, we should treat these as the same as magazines or books. OS25🤙☎️ 19:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm just not seeing the need for a full page, but I don't do series stuff that much, so weight my comments accordingly. Najawin ☎ 19:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I agree with OS25, that subpages might be the best way forward (especially given some cases where there have been multiple releases and a page for each would be messy and convoluted). I also agree "The Collection" sets could have their own page, akin to when DWM do specials for different years/eras/aspects of the show. — Fractal Doctor @ 19:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I like the idea of individual pages for boxsets, but not really for individual releases. A subpage would be better as highlighted above; take the DVD of The Two Doctors, for example, which years after its release the BBC removed A Fix with Sontarans after the Jimmy Savile controversy. The DVDs, to the best of my knowledge, are identical apart of the absence of AFwS and likely the serial number.

Although, that being said, if we were to expand our coverage of bonus features, then individual releases may be justified.

Not sure where we should draw the line between a subpage and an individual page, but we definitely should have pages for at least boxsets.

EPSILON^🔎 |📯|📂|📦|📝

19:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

We might also want to discuss digital availability on subpages as it varies over time, but the main issue there is that those things change so often and they're so hard to keep up to date on every page. Najawin ☎ 20:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

OS25 says we should treat home video collections the same as magazines or books, and I agree, but we already do! Check Category:Box sets. Pages for individual VHS, DVD and Blu-ray collections are well-established on the Wiki.

That being said, I had noticed that this Wiki's coverage of special features and the like is rather poor so I'm glad this thread is shining a light on the issue. I think my ideal scenario would be to reaffirm the existing policy of creating pages for collections and also go with OS25's idea of Home video subpages. The reason that I would prefer single subpages over separate articles is that I believe coverage of special features would be harmed to an extent by the latter. Readers should be able to see which extras are common among editions and splitting this info across several pages is needlessly unhelpful for this purpose in my opinion. Borisashton ☎ 20:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I agree with having separate pages, at the very least for collections (and will probably create Thunderbirds Complete Collection if this passes). Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 21:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)