Trusted
54,534
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{first pic|TVC 674 full.jpg|The full cover of [[TVC 674]].}} | {{first pic|TVC 674 full.jpg|The full cover of [[TVC 674]].}} | ||
[[File:TVC 674 Front Cover Advertising Doctor Who.jpg|thumb|A cropped version of the cover, omitting the ''[[Popeye (series)|Popeye]]'' strip (and, in my opinion, thereby being less informative).]] | [[File:TVC 674 Front Cover Advertising Doctor Who.jpg|thumb|A cropped version of the cover, omitting the ''[[Popeye (series)|Popeye]]'' strip (and, in my opinion, thereby being less informative).]] | ||
[[File:BeanoMAX 1.jpg|left|thumb|Sure, it isn't ''[[Doctor Who Magazine]]'', but ''come on''. ([[BM 1]])]] | |||
Right, so a while ago, [[User:OttselSpy25|another user on this site]] went through various issues of ''[[TV Comic]]'' which featured ''[[Doctor Who]]''-related content, and made pages for them. Admin [[User:CzechOut|CzechOut]] later decided that they didn't deserve pages due to not being released under the ''Doctor Who'' brand, and deleted the pages, redirecting them to a [[TV Comic/Covers|list of covers]]. Additionally, said list of covers only features the very top banners of these issues, with the article claiming that "Because of the lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki, these galleries will mainly function to cover the top banner of the issue.". Personally, I quite strongly disagree. First off, in terms of a "lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki"... we now have [[Popeye (series)|an overview for ''Popeye'']]. And secondly, the full covers would allow the issues to be more easily identifiable (and be more in line with how issues of other periodicals are covered). | Right, so a while ago, [[User:OttselSpy25|another user on this site]] went through various issues of ''[[TV Comic]]'' which featured ''[[Doctor Who]]''-related content, and made pages for them. Admin [[User:CzechOut|CzechOut]] later decided that they didn't deserve pages due to not being released under the ''Doctor Who'' brand, and deleted the pages, redirecting them to a [[TV Comic/Covers|list of covers]]. Additionally, said list of covers only features the very top banners of these issues, with the article claiming that "Because of the lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki, these galleries will mainly function to cover the top banner of the issue.". Personally, I quite strongly disagree. First off, in terms of a "lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki"... we now have [[Popeye (series)|an overview for ''Popeye'']]. And secondly, the full covers would allow the issues to be more easily identifiable (and be more in line with how issues of other periodicals are covered). | ||
Additionally, the idea that the covers couldn't be featured on the site would also suggest that all non-''Doctor Who''-branded periodicals from ''[[TV Century 21]]'' to ''[[BeanoMAX]]'' couldn't be properly illustrated either, at least for specific issues (although these do often advertise the ''DW'' content on their covers... but so does ''TV Comic''!). Although the decision that ''TVC''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s issues couldn't have pages wasn't the result of a forum decision, I feel that a forum thread would allow this issue to be resolved if consensus is reached, as a single individual's choice generally cannot override forum consensus. | Additionally, the idea that the covers couldn't be featured on the site would also suggest that all non-''Doctor Who''-branded periodicals from ''[[TV Century 21]]'' to ''[[BeanoMAX]]'' couldn't be properly illustrated either, at least for specific issues (although these do often advertise the ''DW'' content on their covers... but so does ''TV Comic''!). Although the decision that ''TVC''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s issues couldn't have pages wasn't the result of a forum decision, I feel that a forum thread would allow this issue to be resolved if consensus is reached, as a single individual's choice generally cannot override forum consensus. |