Talk:Lauren Cooper

Delete

Although the sketch is a cross with Doctor Who, the character Lauren Cooper has nothing to do with the universe of Doctor Who, and has no reason to exist. --DCLM ☎ 09:29, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

"Although the sketch is a cross with Doctor Who"

There's your reason the article exists. 09:37, June 28, 2017 (UTC)213.123.3.22^{talk to me}

Not reason enough. It's an invalid source, thus not part of the Doctor Who canon, thus a character-page from said invalid source has even less reason. --DCLM ☎ 10:11, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

"A character-page from said invalid source has even less reason."

Good point. Guess we will have to delete it. Don't forget to delete all these articles too; Emma (The Curse of Fatal Death), Mandy Salter, Gita Kapoor, Grant Mitchell, Phil Mitchell, Antimony, Minister of Chance, Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka), Ninth Doctor (The Curse of Fatal Death), Seventh Doctor (Death Comes to Time), The Doctor (The Web of Caves), and Fotheringown. Thanks! 10:56, June 28, 2017 (UTC)213.123.3.22^{talk to me}

I would ask to keep this discussion civil and adhere to Tardis:Do not disrupt this wiki to prove a point. Note that only admins can delete pages, so there is no danger of sudden wilful deletion. Amorkuz ☎ 10:47, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

I am adhering to that rule. NOT adhering to the rule would be actually tagging the pages for deletion. 213.123.3.22^{talk to me} 10:54, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, your knowledge of this rule will not help much if another, less knowledgable user takes your sarcastic imperative "Don't forget to delete" at face value and they start putting delete tags on all these pages. It would be good in the future to refrain from such imperative statements. Sarcasm can also be easily taken as a sign of aggression, and we do try to keep our deliberations civil. Amorkuz ☎ 14:05, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

Ok, I understand now, sorry. 213.123.3.22^{talk to me} 14:22, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

The talk page indicates this was previously deleted

Checking the deletion log confirms this. Is this an OK page now? --NightmareofEden ☎ 21:03, November 19, 2020 (UTC)

I noticed that too. I'm guessing the rules have changed since then, considering we have a ton of invalid character pages now. WaltK ☎ 23:22, November 19, 2020 (UTC)