User talk:Blue Rook: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No change in size ,  25 November 2014
m
No edit summary
Line 60: Line 60:
To suggest I was threatening you actually irritates me as it's just slander. Take the comment at face value - I don't want you to falsely accuse me. That's all there is to it. I posted my opinions on why the image shouldn't be changed. There's nothing in that original post that constitutes a personal attack. It might have been impassioned, but that's just because I really do not like that image you proposed. [[The Doctor]], [[the Master]] and [[Dalek]] all used to have such collages and they were all scrapped for being an eyesore or misleading. I participated in those discussions, so to see an attempt at revival was unpleasant.
To suggest I was threatening you actually irritates me as it's just slander. Take the comment at face value - I don't want you to falsely accuse me. That's all there is to it. I posted my opinions on why the image shouldn't be changed. There's nothing in that original post that constitutes a personal attack. It might have been impassioned, but that's just because I really do not like that image you proposed. [[The Doctor]], [[the Master]] and [[Dalek]] all used to have such collages and they were all scrapped for being an eyesore or misleading. I participated in those discussions, so to see an attempt at revival was unpleasant.


Now, with absolutely no subtext, please re-read posts before making accusations. If you really think I've attacked you personally, ask another admin to look over it, but they'll probably just tell you what I am - you've either misinterpreted or became disproportionately irate after I disagreed with your proposition. I don't mean to sound patronising, but I'd rather not continue this discussion with more back and forth about who offended who. I've seen many discussions like this before and they don't have a positive outcome. You may want to reply to this saying how wrong I am or whatever, but hopefully you'll realise I really was just disagreeing with you, not attacking you. Thanks--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 19:08, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
Now, with absolutely no subtext, please re-read posts before making accusations. If you really think I've attacked you personally, ask another admin to look over it, but they'll probably just tell you what I am - you've either misinterpreted or become disproportionately irate after I disagreed with your proposition. I don't mean to sound patronising, but I'd rather not continue this discussion with more back and forth about who offended who. I've seen many discussions like this before and they don't have a positive outcome. You may want to reply to this saying how wrong I am or whatever, but hopefully you'll realise I really was just disagreeing with you, not attacking you. Thanks--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 19:08, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
emailconfirmed, Administrators
43,565

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.