User talk:WaltK: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
1,094 bytes added ,  25 January 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 152: Line 152:
== ''A Short History of Everyone'' ==
== ''A Short History of Everyone'' ==
Hiya, I saw [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/2006?curid=306&diff=3386609&oldid=3329321 your recent edit] to [[2006]] which involved information from ''[[A Short History of Everyone (novel)|A Short History of Everyone]]'', and I was wondering if you could share a picture of the relevant section? I've just Wikified ''[[Mars (WiDW short story)|Mars]]'', which seems to have be contradicted by ''ASHoE'', so I want to work out exactly how. Many thanks! {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 01:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Hiya, I saw [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/2006?curid=306&diff=3386609&oldid=3329321 your recent edit] to [[2006]] which involved information from ''[[A Short History of Everyone (novel)|A Short History of Everyone]]'', and I was wondering if you could share a picture of the relevant section? I've just Wikified ''[[Mars (WiDW short story)|Mars]]'', which seems to have be contradicted by ''ASHoE'', so I want to work out exactly how. Many thanks! {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 01:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
== Dimensions in Time proposal ==
Hey, just saw your ''Dimensions in Time'' proposal and I'm not sure I grasp what you intend this thread to be. Obviously now that it's valid, the ''[[First Frontier (novel)|First Frontier]]'' connection can be Wikified as "one account" like any other valid source that says this about another valid source — in much the same way that the ''Conundrum'' and ''Land of Happy Endings'' interpretations are listed at [[John Who]] and [[Gillian Who]]. We don't need a thread for this! As I understood it, the caveat about further threads to clarify "the nature of stories' validity" after a Rule 4 By Proxy ruling would just be for people who want to argue that no Proxy was necessary because the original story passed Rule 4 all along and its invalidity was incorrect in the first place; but there's no need for a new thread that's just about a ''different'' proxy-avenue not mentioned in the original thread. Is there something else that I'm missing? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 23:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,357

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.