Forum:Temporary forums/Inclusion debates speedround: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 641: Line 641:


:This one I'm skeptical on. I've read the story, and to me it seems like more a parody akin to ''Doctor Who?'s'' brand of dry whit, written more sentimental but retaining the same parodic "vibe." I get it, we shouldn't use a vibe to judge a story's continuity. But even though it is a mainline comic strip, it's a good indicator for invalidity if it reads as a ''Doctor Who?'' strip rather than any other mainline strip of that decade. Sorry for being the fun police, I really am! I just think we need more discussion on its authorial intent. [[User:LilPotato|LilPotato]] [[User talk:LilPotato|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
:This one I'm skeptical on. I've read the story, and to me it seems like more a parody akin to ''Doctor Who?'s'' brand of dry whit, written more sentimental but retaining the same parodic "vibe." I get it, we shouldn't use a vibe to judge a story's continuity. But even though it is a mainline comic strip, it's a good indicator for invalidity if it reads as a ''Doctor Who?'' strip rather than any other mainline strip of that decade. Sorry for being the fun police, I really am! I just think we need more discussion on its authorial intent. [[User:LilPotato|LilPotato]] [[User talk:LilPotato|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
:: Fangs isn't parody, it's just meta fictional. [[Special:Contributions/81.108.82.15|81.108.82.15]]<sup>[[User talk:81.108.82.15#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


:: Re. ''Senor 105''... funny misconception that I distinctly remember. [[Cody Schell]] ''never ever'' it wasn't set in the DWU. He said it didn't belong on a ''Doctor Who'' Wiki. That is a large distinction everyone glossed over.
:: Re. ''Senor 105''... funny misconception that I distinctly remember. [[Cody Schell]] ''never ever'' it wasn't set in the DWU. He said it didn't belong on a ''Doctor Who'' Wiki. That is a large distinction everyone glossed over.
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.