Trusted
8,500
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
:: @Epsilon: This is a fair point, yes — the sheer wealth of ''content'' in Hanley's covers that has no easy venue for coverage if we don't give these covers discrete pages. But still — there are strong arguments against, and it wasn't quite within the scope of the original ruling. So if we're going to get into this, I think a thread would be warranted. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 21:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | :: @Epsilon: This is a fair point, yes — the sheer wealth of ''content'' in Hanley's covers that has no easy venue for coverage if we don't give these covers discrete pages. But still — there are strong arguments against, and it wasn't quite within the scope of the original ruling. So if we're going to get into this, I think a thread would be warranted. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 21:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::I think the issue that we didn't really discuss them in particular could be sufficient with a real argument - not just "but this is madness"? But I'm just spitballing. Certainly I'm not convinced with what we have here. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC) |