3,702
edits
Talk:Warp Hustler (series): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:: @Epsilon: This is a fair point, yes — the sheer wealth of ''content'' in Hanley's covers that has no easy venue for coverage if we don't give these covers discrete pages. But still — there are strong arguments against, and it wasn't quite within the scope of the original ruling. So if we're going to get into this, I think a thread would be warranted. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 21:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | :: @Epsilon: This is a fair point, yes — the sheer wealth of ''content'' in Hanley's covers that has no easy venue for coverage if we don't give these covers discrete pages. But still — there are strong arguments against, and it wasn't quite within the scope of the original ruling. So if we're going to get into this, I think a thread would be warranted. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 21:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::I think the issue that we didn't really discuss them in particular could be sufficient with a real argument - not just "but this is madness"? But I'm just spitballing. Certainly I'm not convinced with what we have here. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | :::I think the issue that we didn't really discuss them in particular could be sufficient with a real argument - not just "but this is madness"? But I'm just spitballing. Certainly I'm not convinced with what we have here. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: Can't it be both? I can barely read it let alone understand it, but the stuff I have seen stemming from it (that was being accepted until I called it out) has baffled me even more. Users shouldn't have to use dictionaries or Google to understand a policy, you should know your audience. I can guarantee most people have never heard the word "abrogated" and there was no reason you couldn't have used simpler words like "overturned"/"overruled". | |||
::: I want calcification on this work of fiction lark. If these illustration pages, featuring single quotes from work that hasn't even been released yet, aren't valid why haven't they been pounced on and deleted like my page was the other day? As for Paul Hanley's covers, what makes them different from anyone else's? It is all very well and good for Epilson to call him a "different beast" but I fail to see anything innovative other than him shoving a bunch of characters together on a cover. There's no story, there's no narrative, there's nothing to create a story/appearance page for that couldn't be contained in the background information section of the published work. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
