John Nathan-Turner (in-universe): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Adding categories)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


== Behind the scenes ==
== Behind the scenes ==
It is believed that the cameo appearance of [[John Nathan-Turner]] is nothing more than a blooper, as John had been attempting to manage the crowds during production;<ref>[http://www.shannonsullivan.com/drwho/serials/6e.html ''Arc of Infinity'' on shannonsullivan.com]</ref> however, John later claimed that his cameo had been intentional, in the vein of a [[Alfred Hitchcock|Hitchcockian]] cameo.<ref>[https://www.timelash.com/bloopers/story.php?508-Arc-of-Infinity ''Arc of Infinity'' bloopers on timelash.com]</ref>{{Facts}}
It is believed that the cameo appearance of [[John Nathan-Turner]] is nothing more than a blooper, as he had been attempting to manage the crowds during production.<ref>[http://www.shannonsullivan.com/drwho/serials/6e.html ''Arc of Infinity'' on shannonsullivan.com]</ref>  
 
However, Nathan-Turner later claimed that his cameo had been intentional, in the vein of a [[Alfred Hitchcock|Hitchcockian]] cameo.<ref>[https://www.timelash.com/bloopers/story.php?508-Arc-of-Infinity ''Arc of Infinity'' bloopers on timelash.com]</ref>{{Facts}}


== Footnotes ==
== Footnotes ==

Latest revision as of 17:04, 25 March 2023

"John Nathan-Turner (in-universe)" is a title based upon conjecture.

Check the behind the scenes section, the revision history and discussion page for additional comments on this article's title.

In January, 1983 in Amsterdam, a man wearing a sheepskin coat walked past the telephone box in which the Fifth Doctor, Tegan Jovanka, and Nyssa stood next to after defeating Omega. (TV: Arc of Infinity)

Behind the scenes[[edit] | [edit source]]

It is believed that the cameo appearance of John Nathan-Turner is nothing more than a blooper, as he had been attempting to manage the crowds during production.[1]

However, Nathan-Turner later claimed that his cameo had been intentional, in the vein of a Hitchcockian cameo.[2][additional sources needed]

Footnotes[[edit] | [edit source]]